Home / Smart City
Governance of new cities
New cities are usually run by a dedicated development authority plus a special purpose vehicle, rather than by an ordinary municipality. Dholera uses this model: DSIRDA is the statutory planning and land authority, DICDL is the building SPV jointly owned by the Gujarat and central governments, and NICDC coordinates from the centre, with single-window clearance for industry.
Last checked 2026-08-11 · every figure below carries its source
Why new cities need special governance
A greenfield city cannot be run like an established town in its early years, because there is no existing municipal body, tax base or population to govern in the usual way. Instead, new cities are typically created and managed through dedicated institutions: a development authority with statutory powers over planning and land, and often a special purpose vehicle, or SPV, that actually builds and manages the infrastructure. This structure concentrates the powers needed to acquire or pool land, sanction plans, lay infrastructure and attract industry, all before a conventional municipality could exist. Understanding this governance model is important, because it determines who decides what and who is accountable during the long construction phase. Dholera is a clear example of the approach.
Dholera's institutions
Dholera's governance has three main layers. DSIRDA, the Dholera Special Investment Region Development Authority, is the statutory planning and land authority, created under the Gujarat Special Investment Region Act, 2009, with power over the master plan and the Town Planning schemes. DICDL, the Dholera Industrial City Development Limited, is the SPV that builds and develops the city, incorporated on 28 January 2016 and owned 51 percent by the Gujarat government through DSIRDA and 49 percent by the central government through the NICDC Trust. NICDC, the National Industrial Corridor Development Corporation, is the central nodal agency that coordinates the corridor and monitors progress. This layered arrangement is meant to combine state planning powers, a dedicated delivery company and central coordination and funding.
Single-window clearance and its purpose
A distinctive governance feature of Special Investment Regions like Dholera is single-window clearance, run from the ABCD administrative building. The idea is to consolidate the many approvals an industrial project normally needs, across departments and agencies, into one coordinated process, reducing delay and uncertainty for investors. For a city trying to attract manufacturing, this is a genuine draw, because approval friction is a major deterrent elsewhere. It also reflects the broader logic of the SPV-plus-authority model: concentrate decision-making so that a new city can be built and populated efficiently. As with all such claims, the practical effectiveness of single-window clearance depends on implementation, which is best judged by the experience of actual tenants over time rather than by the promise alone.
Strengths, limits and accountability
The special-governance model has clear strengths: focused powers, dedicated delivery and, in Dholera's case, dual state and central backing that is meant to give stability across political cycles. But it has limits worth naming. Governance by authority and SPV is less like ordinary democratic municipal government, so questions of resident representation and long-term local accountability arise as the city eventually populates. And structure does not guarantee delivery; Dholera has a documented history of delays and land-acquisition litigation, including the 2015 Gujarat High Court stay. The honest reading is that Dholera's governance is well-suited to building a new city and gives it real institutional backing, while the transition to normal civic governance as residents arrive is a future question. This page explains governance neutrally and does not offer investment advice.
The eventual handover
A question that special-purpose governance eventually has to answer is how a new city transitions to ordinary civic government as it fills with residents. In the building phase, an authority and a special purpose vehicle make sense, because they concentrate the powers and capital needed to construct a city where no municipality yet exists. But once people live there in numbers, expectations of local representation, elected bodies and everyday municipal accountability naturally follow. How and when that handover happens shapes the long-term character of a place, and it is a live issue for any greenfield city, including Dholera. Detailed arrangements for Dholera's eventual civic governance are not prominent in public sources, so this is an area to watch rather than to assert. The point for a reader is that today's development-authority model is suited to construction, and the shift to resident-facing governance is a future chapter still to be written.