Home / Smart City
Dholera compared with Nusantara, Indonesia
Nusantara is Indonesia's new planned capital in East Kalimantan, announced in 2019 to relocate the seat of government from Jakarta. Like Dholera, it is a large greenfield build backed by the state, but its purpose is capital relocation rather than industry. Comparing them shows how purpose and political commitment shape a new city's prospects.
Last checked 2026-08-11 · every figure below carries its source
Two large state-backed new cities
Nusantara and Dholera are both very large, state-backed greenfield projects, planned on largely open land and driven by national ambition. Nusantara is Indonesia's new capital city, announced in 2019 and under construction in East Kalimantan on the island of Borneo, intended to relocate the capital from an overcrowded and environmentally stressed Jakarta. Its purpose is primarily to house government and to rebalance national development away from the existing capital. Dholera is India's flagship greenfield industrial smart city on the Gujarat coast, a node of the Delhi Mumbai Industrial Corridor, built to host manufacturing and industry. Both are big bets by their governments on building a major new place from scratch, which makes them natural comparisons even though their functions differ.
Capital relocation versus industrial city
The purposes diverge sharply. Nusantara is a capital-relocation project, so its anchor is the state and its early population is expected to be government and associated services, similar in logic to Putrajaya but on a far larger scale. Dholera is an industrial city, so its anchor is private industry, led by the semiconductor fab reported under construction, and its early population is expected to be industrial workers and their supply chains. This means Nusantara can, in principle, rely on a committed government mover to seed it, whereas Dholera must attract private employers first. Each faces a different core challenge: Nusantara must actually move the capital and persuade people to relocate, while Dholera must generate industrial demand where little existed.
The role of political commitment
Both projects illustrate how central political commitment is to a new city. Capital relocations like Nusantara depend heavily on sustained government resolve across administrations, and such projects are vulnerable to shifting priorities and funding. Dholera similarly depends on continuity, and it has the advantage of dual backing, with the Gujarat government holding 51 percent and the central government 49 percent of the building SPV, DICDL (Dholera Industrial City Development Limited, the company that builds the city), through the NICDC (the National Industrial Corridor Development Corporation, the central agency behind the corridor) Trust. Both also share the reality of long timelines and the risk of slippage; Dholera has a documented history of delays, and large capital moves are notoriously slow everywhere. The comparison underlines that for either project, decades of steady commitment matter more than the initial announcement.
What the comparison teaches
Comparing Dholera with Nusantara clarifies that a new city's prospects hinge on purpose and commitment as much as on design. Nusantara has a clear anchor in relocating government but faces the enormous task of actually moving a capital. Dholera lacks a captive government anchor but has concrete, well-sourced industrial commitments to build around. Neither is finished, and both should be judged by dated progress rather than by launch visions. For a reader, the useful takeaway is that Dholera is an industry-anchored bet whose fate depends on private projects maturing and on sustained state and central backing, a different but comparably demanding path to Nusantara's. This is a neutral planning comparison and not investment advice.
A note on timelines
Both projects are also cautionary examples about timelines. Capital relocations and large greenfield cities routinely take far longer than their initial schedules, as commitments, funding and construction stretch over many years and across political cycles. Nusantara's move of a national capital is an immense, multi-decade undertaking, and Dholera's own plan spans roughly 30 years with a promotional horizon sometimes framed around 2040, 2042 or 2047. Dholera has a documented history of slipping dates, most visibly its airport. The sensible response is not to dismiss either project but to read their timelines as long and their interim announcements as targets, judging progress by dated milestones. For Dholera specifically, this means expecting a decades-long build, treating the grand end state as a distant aspiration, and watching the concrete markers, such as the expressway, the fab and government spending, that actually indicate movement.